This is the second of a two-part series. You can read part one on the causes of child care insecurity on HR Exchange Network.
The lack of affordable and available child care in the United States continues to take its toll on workers and employers alike. It not only affects working parents with child care needs, consider the effect on coworkers who have to pick up the slack of absent team members or the staffing shortages organizations experience, especially small businesses, when parents take leaves of absence or quit their jobs because of child care complications.
READ: Part One in the Series on Child Care to Learn about the Causes
The Business Case for Providing Support
Employers lose an estimated $23 billion a year because of child care-related complications, resulting in a $122 billion hit to the U.S. economy (lost wages, productivity, and tax revenue), according to a recent study from ReadyNation.
KinderCare, one of the country’s largest day-care operators, is constantly fielding questions from employers asking for help in solving child-care needs—needs they didn’t realize they were a part of before COVID.
In an environment with a tight job market—more job openings than people looking for work—the child-care industry is hit particularly hard. There is a need for more people to work in child care and a need for a career pipeline. But it’s hard to attract workers into a profession that requires credentialing and where the pay is so low. The child-care workforce was one of the slowest to recover from the pandemic, and it was predicted it would lose another 232,000 jobs once the federal pandemic child-care subsidy program ended.
How Employers are Responding
Conflict can often prompt creativity. The same can be said of crisis. Employers are responding in some very unique ways, from the conversion of office space to building new, on-site centers.
Micron Technology opened a center across the street from its HQ in Boise, Idaho and one near a manufacturing plant in central New York. It also invested money to train care providers and early-childhood teachers to address the talent shortage.
The Washington Post reports that Tyson Foods built a center in Humboldt, Tennessee to accommodate its shift workers; Hormel is building a $5 million child-care facility in Austin, Minnesota; and medical services company VGM Group is converting 8,000 square feet of office space into a day-care center in Waterloo, Iowa. While costly, employers are finding that on-site child care can attract and retain employees.
Pittsburgh International Airport opened a child-care center with plans to expand it to round-the-clock care to accommodate night-shift workers. They also added public bus routes to make transportation to work easier.
READ: One Way to Recruit Moms
A charter school in Wisconsin—to avoid losing staff in a tight labor market—converted space into an infant-care center and are providing a 25% subsidy to the parents.
Another creative option is offering tuition subsidies to parents that can be used anywhere or in any manner to meet their needs, such as summer camps or after-school programs. Since child care needs vary over time, there is no one-size-fits-all solution.
Organizations such as Bright Horizons and KinderCare report a large uptick in employers inquiring about on-site child care along with information on backup options for emergency care.
As employers are realizing they need to be part of the solution to this crisis, can they expect to see a return on these hefty investments? According to an analysis of five companies that offer child care benefits, the positive financial impact can include an ROI of up to 425%. The benefits included monthly stipends of $1,000, near-site centers, and emergency on-site daycare. The companies have seen reduced absences and better retention, not to mention increased morale:
"It’s not just the money, it’s the principle. It feels like a 'thank you.' It’s an incredible morale booster. Even if another company offered me more money tomorrow, I wouldn’t even consider it, given how much this company has invested in my personal life."
Government Programs and Public Policymakers
As mentioned in the previous article, most child-care businesses operated with less than a 1% profit before the pandemic. Other countries address that instability by subsidizing parents’ costs, an investment that allows child-care providers to charge adequate rates. However, the United States spends less than almost every other rich country on child care and early education.
During the pandemic the federal government sent out $24 billion in aid packages to the industry, which helped head off 75,000 child-care center closures. However, the Child Care Stabilization Grant expired on September 30, 2023. The Century Foundation’s Child Care Cliff Survey anticipated the impact the expiration of funds will have, including a loss in tax and business revenue of $10.6 billion.
Long-term solutions are needed. In its 2023 Kids Count Data Book, The Annie E. Casey Foundation offers suggestions: federal, state, and local government investment in child care including reauthorizing and strengthening the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act; collaboration among public and private leaders to improve the infrastructure for home-based child care; expanding the federal Child Care Access Means Parents in School program which serves student parents.
Private industry is beginning to see a return on its investment in child care benefits. Imagine the results—and the effect on society—if policymakers along with industry leaders take the leap to implement programs and build a system to make child care more affordable, available, and accessible.
Beyond it being an economic issue, a social issue, and a workforce issue, "…it’s a humanity issue," writes Petula Dvorak, Washington Post Columnist.